You are viewing benchilada

Sometimes I like these people... Below are the 10 most recent friends journal entries:

[<< Previous 10 entries]

May 23rd, 2013
12:00 am
cyanideandhappy

[Link]

05.23.2013

http://www.explosm.net/comics/3180/

New Cyanide and Happiness Comic.

(Leave a comment)

07:43 pm
ptakscience

[Link]

Our Galaxy is Not Alone, 1925

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/Aeos/~3/sPruHS8RhWg/new-vastness-of-the-universe-1925.html

http://longstreet.typepad.com/thesciencebookstore/2013/05/new-vastness-of-the-universe-1925.html

JF Ptak Science Books  Post 2027

I was about to post this great image of the attendees of a significant meeting of the American Astronomical Society taken during the meeting in D.C. over New Year's 1924 (Dec 30 1924-January 1, 1925--certainly no one for many years has thought about holding a professional meeting on such a date!1) but I cannot let it pass that the paper on the other side of the photo was one of very high importance.  

First, the photo, which I have not yet been able to locate easily online:

Aas 1925305
[More detailed closeups are available in the continued reading section, below.  Source:  Popular Astronomy, volume 33, April, 1925.]

The paper directly opposite the slick reverse of the photo spread is Edwin Hubble's "Cepheids in the Spiral Nebulae"--it was reported in the issue of Popular Astronomy for the 1924 meeting, though Hubble himself wasn't actually there.  No matter--he was a meticulous and methodical man, and it seems he was at odd in pressing his results into print too quickly because it contradicted established thinking, which called for caution.  (The results of his findings had been earlier presented in the New York Times in November 19242.) But the paper--to paraphrase my brother-in-law Mickey Digh--"was what it was", and (using Shapley's calibration for the period-luminosity relation, published in the Astrophysical Journal in 1918) announced the discovery of Cepheid variable stars in the nebulae M 31 and M 33, placing them at vast distances, well outside our galaxy.  This in effect established that the belief of our galaxy being the only galaxy in he universe was incorrect, and that the Great Debate arguing these points on the nature of the nebulae and begun decades earlier was settled.

In the next year, 1926, Hubble would contribute a paper on the classification of the nebulae ("Extra-galactic Nebulae", in the Astrophysical Journal, volume 64, pp 321-369) which was highly adaptable and proved to be iconic.  Three years later, continuing on the theme of the 1925 paper, Hubble published what has been seen by many as the great astronomical paper of the century, the 1929 Velocity-distance relationship, with Hubble's Constant.  So not only were there galaxies existing outside of our own as he had demonstrated in 1925, but that these galaxies were moving, and quickly, away from each other, everywhere.  This was the establishment of the expanding universe--the Big Bang stuff (famously put forward in the April 1 Alpher-Bethe-Gamow paper by Alpher, Gamow and Herman but no Bethe, a bit of nerd humor to get ABC out of the initials of the authors of the paper on April Fool's Day, 1939) would come about to explain what the 1929 paper established. 

Anyway, the 1925 paper is a major step in the history of cosmology, and perhaps the greatest effort in observational cosmology of the 20th century.  

 

Aas 1925307
Aas 1925306
Notes:

1. I must admit, poor suffering reader, that this writer managed to once schedule a meeting of a microscopical and scientific instrument society swap/one-day meeting on Mother's Day, years ago. Not good.

2. The results of Hubble's work had been widely distributed among astronomers prior to the reading of the paper on 1 January 1925 at the meeting, this according to Lang and Gingerich in the great A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900-1975, page 713, and also Michael Crowe, Modern Theories of the Universe, from Herschel to Hubble, page 336. Also see the work by R.Berendzen and M.Hoskin "Hubble's Announcement of Cepheids in Spiral Nebulae", 1971, here.

(Leave a comment)

12:57 am
wouldntnotice

[Link]

Monkeying Around with Copyrights

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/YouThoughtWeWouldntNotice/~3/I32Bkz9SLOI/

http://youthoughtwewouldntnotice.com/blog3/?p=19229

ATTORNEY SCOTT COMMENTARY

The below case (assuming it is indeed an infringement) highlights the not-uncommon scenario in which an artist is induced to infringe the intellectual property rights of another. What tends to happen in these scenarios is that an artist is given "source material" to which the giver indicates rights have been obtained (or says nothing at all), and the artist is instructed to modify or adapt it. Assuming that the giver does not have the rights to the "source material," what results is an unlawful derivative or composite work, which is an infringement of the "source material" artist's rights.

What is the responsibility of an artist asked to adapt "source material" by another party? Should the artist confirm that the material was properly obtained, or is there an assumption that "source material" would not be provided if it had not previously been licensed, obtained, or otherwise cleared for use?

-Attorney Scott (scott@copyrightLA.com)

***

Dear YTWWN:

I had a surprise today when a friend send me an email with a link of Marc Ahumada's behance page. It figures a project called 'Monitoradio Advertising', a job he was called up to do for a radio station from Perú called Monitoradio. The main character of the graphic identity is taken from a drawing that I had made years ago for my website. I contacted the designer and he told me that the people from the radio station gave him the logo for him to do the advertising, so apparently he has nothing to do with the ripoff.

There is nothing I can do since I don't live on that country, but I don't care. I just want to make sure people know where the monkey comes from.

Here is my original design:

Monitoradio's logo:

Apparently the cans that he uses on his project are also a ripoff from a Coca Cola redesign proposal.

Marc Ahumada's cans:

The Coca Cola cans:

 

(Leave a comment)

02:56 pm
cyanideandhappy

[Link]

NEWS: New Shirt

http://www.explosm.net/#20130522

News

(Leave a comment)

12:16 am
cleansk_tumblr

[Link]

groc: Steal This Bike & I’ll Peck Your Eyes Out by Dave...

http://cleanskies.tumblr.com/post/51104205082



groc:

Steal This Bike & I’ll Peck Your Eyes Out by Dave Gorman on Flickr.

pidge!!!!

(Leave a comment)

12:14 am
cleansk_tumblr

[Link]

blech: Voyager space probe diagram, posted by x-ray delta one...

http://cleanskies.tumblr.com/post/51104104981



blech:

Voyager space probe diagram, posted by x-ray delta one (via balnibarbi)

Under the blankets, it’s beautiful

(Leave a comment)

May 22nd, 2013
03:34 pm
softerworldfeed

[Link]

A Softer World

http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=972


buy this print
Or share on: facebook reddit

(Leave a comment)

09:31 pm
minusgarfield

[Link]

G-G the book - G-G on Facebook - G-G on Twitter

http://garfieldminusgarfield.net/post/51091766855



G-G the book - G-G on Facebook - G-G on Twitter

(Leave a comment)

03:32 pm
mighty_god_king

[Link]

To Kindlefinity And Beyond

http://mightygodking.com/2013/05/22/to-kindlefinity-and-beyond/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=to-kindlefinity-and-beyond

http://mightygodking.com/?p=7951

So Amazon has announce Kindle Worlds, which is kind of sickly brilliant: it’s basically an online publishing house for fan-fiction, wherein royalties are paid to the owners of the IP and to the author of the fanfic. And the royalty to the author is, frankly, not bad – 20-35% of total revenue of digital sales of the work.

Of course, it’s not all candy and sunshine. If you look at the more detailed explanation, Amazon explains that it will own all rights to the work for the entire term of copyright, including (most importantly) reprint and adaptation rights. If the CW likes your Vampire Diaries story so much they want to convert it into an episode or two, then they will pay Amazon instead of you. If the CW doesn’t like your Vampire Diaries story but does like your moody vampire character named Steve, Amazon will grant them “a license to use your new elements and incorporate them into other works without further compensation to you.” This is, to say the least, kind of problematic. The simple explanation doesn’t even say if you’ll be credited as the creator of those elements, which to many fanfic authors I think would be one of the most important things.

And remember, this is for the entire term of copyright, which means for as long as money can be made off it (e.g. until long after you are dead) Amazon will control it entirely. So to call this a “bad contract” is kind of a major understatement, isn’t it?

Well, yes and no. We are after all talking about fan-fiction – something that is only quasi-legal at the best of times. Amazon has found a way for fanfic writers to get paid something for their work (and it’s a pretty reasonable something) and to be recognized for their craft, and if the terms are draconian, they are still a major improvement over what previously existed, which is “nothing, or maybe get sued for copyright infringement.” If Amazon includes some more reasonable terms for compensation with respect to profits from reprints and adaptations it will be approaching “good.” Frankly it’s already more than I expected what this would eventually look like when it happened.

Of course, no discussion of payment-for-fanfic is complete without the standard admonishment of “you should just write your own original stuff that you own and control.” But I understand the desire to write works set in an existing universe all too well. And I am forced to admit: if DC Comics suddenly became a “World Licensor” for this thing, and if Amazon extended its digital publishing to include comics… I would be, at the very least, significantly tempted to write certain properties as I saw fit. I am only human, after all.

(Leave a comment)

03:15 pm
photoshpdiaster

[Link]

The Stroller Strategy: Back Me Up Here

http://www.psdisasters.com/2013/05/the-stroller-strategy-back-me-up-here.html

http://www.psdisasters.com/?p=4629

Rarely are movie studios so transparent about what they don’t include in a film.

Photoshop Disasters

I thought we were looking at a checkerboard background, until I saw the movie poster and realized somebody forgot to include the grey background layer. It’s like that time my parents left me at the mall, but in this instance, someone eventually noticed.

Nice find Graham. You can see the original on the Apple site.

The post The Stroller Strategy: Back Me Up Here appeared first on PSD : Photoshop Disasters .

(Leave a comment)

[<< Previous 10 entries]

Free blog counter My other daily online haunt Powered by LiveJournal.com